Introducing Reviewer keep control over ticket generation

Watcher first automation that teams trust

Publishing a Figma library can open tickets instantly in your tracker. That speed is great until it isn’t. Teams told us they could not always predict what would become a ticket or where it would go.

Some publishes are purely for visual checks. Component nesting can create redundant or noisy tickets.

And relying only on raw Figma data makes it hard to guarantee the right volume and structure every time.

A review step that fits your flow

Reviewer adds an intermediate step between Figma publish and ticket creation in your connected tools.

Instead of pushing everything by default, Lyse collects the detected changes in a dedicated inbox. You decide what should move forward to Linear, Jira, GitHub, or GitLab and what should not.

Reviewer adds a simple gate to your publish to ticket flow

• Preview each proposed ticket with a clean summary of the change

• Approve to push it to your provider

• Ignore to skip once

The result is the speed of automation with the confidence of a quick human check.

Clearer handoff fewer surprises

Reviewer clarifies the path from Publish Library to Ticket. You see exactly which component updates were detected and how they will translate into work.

That makes it safe to publish for visual tests without polluting your backlog. It also reduces duplicate tickets caused by complex component structures.

Designed for product teams that need speed without losing control

Reviewer is built for real teams. It filters lower value tickets before they reach the tracker so noise drops.

Approved items keep the context Lyse adds so intent stays clear. Only validated work lands in your projects which keeps planning predictable. Unwanted tasks stop slipping through so rollbacks become rare.

Questions we hear from teams

What connections are required to use Reviewer in your workflow ?

Minimum setup is Figma plus one ticket provider. Connect your Figma file with a Personal Access Token that has Admin access in the team so Lyse can read publishes. Then connect at least one provider such as Linear, Jira, GitHub, or GitLab. Multiple providers are supported.

Will review slow us down ?

The step is lightweight. Most teams approve in a few clicks and use bulk actions for routine updates. You keep automation speed while avoiding unwanted work.

Does context stay intact after approval ?

Yes. Approved tickets include the same Lyse context used by Watcher so engineers and AI tools can execute with confidence.

Which tools are supported ?

Linear Jira GitHub and GitLab. Approve in Lyse then push to the provider your team uses.

What this unlocks when teams add a review step to automated handoff

Automation should move work forward not create uncertainty. Reviewer adds a small intentional pause between Figma publish and ticket creation so you can preview approve ignore or archive before anything reaches your tracker. Keep the speed. Keep the control.

Keep speed with control

If you want automation without surprise, Reviewer adds a light check before tickets go live in Linear, Jira, GitHub, or GitLab.

Request early access and preview, approve, or archive tickets before pushing them to your tracker.